Skip to content
Legacy Resources

Might Different Countries Emulate Australia's Example in Restricting Online Networks for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's decisive action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are considering similar measures.

  • Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy may be formalized soon.
  • Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential options on the table".
  • In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
  • The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong data".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and fit for minors," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

  • Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
  • The state of Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
  • The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring adult authorization for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various individuals to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

  • The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
  • Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global organizations strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in safety.

As this international conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.

JP
About the author

John Powell

A heritage consultant with over 15 years of experience in preserving historical sites across the UK.

Legacy Resources

Type to search articles.